Refereed Article Science, biodiversity and Australian management of marine ecosystems.
Citation: Kenchington, R. A; Hutchings, P. A. 2012. Science, biodiversity and Australian management of marine ecosystems.. Ocean & Coastal Management. 69. 194-199. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.08.009).Abstract:
The United Nations Convention on Law of the Sea (UN 1982) came into effect in 1994. Signatory nations have substantial management obligations for conservation of marine natural resources and ecosystems. In this paper we discuss the challenges of defining and monitoring biodiversity at scales required for such management. Australia's area of immediate responsibility under UNCLOS covers an area of 11 million sq km with further linked responsibilities for an estimated area of 5.1 million sq km of continental shelf. This presents substantial data challenges for development and implementation of management. Acoustic seabed mapping is providing substantial information on seabed surface geology and topography and provides a surrogate basis for describing benthic habitat and seabed communities that have critical roles in marine food chains. The development of the Integrated Marine and Coastal Regionalisation of Australia (IMCRA 4.0)(Commonwealth of Australia 2006) has provided a systematic basis for planning marine biodiversity and resource management but the biological habitat interpretation of geological data is based very largely on demersal fish data. It is recognised in IMCRA 4.0 (2006) that revision and refinement of regionalisation requires further work in the areas of data coverage, ecosystem understanding and ecosystem surrogates and conceptual classification models. Such work is constrained by the lack of taxonomic expertise. In this paper we discuss Australian experience highlighting problems and issues of relevance for scientifically based management of marine natural resource and ecosystems elsewhere in the world.